holly lockett/rose

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
winston69
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by winston69 »

It's gone
krisman
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by krisman »

Thought it might considering the high amount of views the image had.

I don't really get why the model openly advertised to do adult work, but never shows her face in any of the stuff she shoots.

I can understand worrying about it coming back to haunt her etc etc, but surely just don't shoot to adult levels then.
Luke789
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by Luke789 »

sexy

[url=http://www.wikismut.com/]A site full of free porn for you[/url]
krisman
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by krisman »

Fuck off luke
LucyAkhurst
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by LucyAkhurst »

That?s bizarre, why take a picture you don?t want to be seen and appreciated ?
winston69
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by winston69 »

Money
Kebabfan
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by Kebabfan »

No idea how she gets away with charging ?80 per hour for adult shoots when she doesn't show her face. There are much better looking models who charge a lot less than that. Perhaps each shoot is guaranteed a happy ending?😁
winston69
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by winston69 »

Always wondered myself.
BreastLover22
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by BreastLover22 »

Yes, her rates are rediculous. How any model can think they are worth ?1 or more a minute is beyond me.
winston69
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: holly lockett/rose

Post by winston69 »

If my math is right, your post reeks of sarcasm. Those would be good rates I reckon...but to hide one's face? That's when those rates start looking quite odd.
Post Reply