leanne hemsworth

[Hello099]

Does she do any boy on girl stuff or masturbation pics/movies???

[Emac]

>> "Holly Locket/Lockett/Rose has done nudes."

And yet no links? Doesn't seem likely she has done nudes, which is a shame.

[Hugh6821]

1. The already mentioned Invisible Ham site has her nude.
2. There has been full nudes of her posted on the purestorm modelling site.

If you want to see her nude
1. Join Invisible Ham
OR
2. Set up a shoot with her

[Emac]

The request hasn't so far been to see her nude per se, but rather to check whether she does actually shoot nudes. Saying "The already mentioned Invisible Ham site has her nude." doesn't prove she has, it still just means you've said it. Her PS page, at http://www.purestorm.com/profile.aspx?id=hollylocket has NO nude photos, I checked. The highest level she states is glamour. Even her own site, which is referenced on PS has not a hint of nudity.

Your call to either join a site where she is fabled to be nude jus makes no sense, any more than the all to ok her to do a shoot at a level to which she clearly doesn't work.

Are you sure you're not confusing holly with Leanne, whom we're discussing in this thread?

It's all good and well to state in emphatic bullet points that Holly has done nude, and I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong, but I'd ask one little question:

Where's the evidence?

[Hugh6821]

Have you actually checked the Invisible Ham site? Which has preview photos of her nude?

And no, I'm not confusing her with Leanne. Leanne does more explicit work than Holly.

[Emac]

I promise you mate, I try not to state things I haven't checked. I'm not saying he nudes aren't there, but if you're so certain, what would prevent you from posting a link?

[Hugh6821]

"The request hasn't so far been to see her nude per se, but rather to check whether she does actually shoot nudes."

Then why are you asking for links to nude photos of her?

Her Purestorm profile also includes a link to her site, from which you can contact her. If you actually wanted to find out if she did nudes, then that would be the easiest way instead of asking for links to nude photos of her, which would be more of interest to those who are only interested in seeing nude photos of her.

Are you totally unable to identify her on the Invisible Ham site?

[davetherave]

I'm so surprised that a post that publishes a model's real name has been allowed to stay unaltered for so long.

She may occassionally be published under her real first name, but she's never been published under her full name. Yet.

Come on admin, please change & remove all mention of her name in this post.

[Emac]

Your talent for twisting words is impressive, son, you should be a politician. It's disingenuous to declare that anyone is "asking for links to nude photos of her" on its own. I'm putting it to you that Holly hasn't done nudes, something she herself hasn't declared, and because there is no evidence of your claim. You are contending that she has, and yet despite all your words, you can't produce a shred of proof to back up your position, just claim upon claim.

I know about her website; I mentioned it myself earlier. I don't need to contact her; I'm quite clear that she doesn't do nude, so why would I need to ask?

Why not make this simple, cut through all this artificial fog, and just post the link? Could it be that we're more likely to find Nessi?

[Emac]

davetherave wrote:

> I'm so surprised that a post that publishes a model's real name
> has been allowed to stay unaltered for so long.
>

I'd take your point if her name had been mentioned in a derogatory way, but I don't think it has, has it?