Escorts

[rednose]

I am well aware of the Forum rules on the subject of Escorts, so won't be mentioning anyone by name.

I just find it a little funny that we aren't allowed to mention Escorts on the forums but the Promotions forum seems to be full of people advertising "Adult Porn Parties", not quite sure I can tell the difference!

Rednose

[videokim]

No difference really but once word gets around you can advertise them on here we will need a bigger forum, i do regular parties myself with friends in Essex & the home counties but this is a model database forum so it should be kept that way.
I have no problem with escorts & party girls but you have to advertise where you will get maximum publicity & a model forum ain't the place lol!

Kim x

[KazB]

At least if sex party performers advertise what they are doing - those who are selective about who they work with are able to decide who may be riskier to work with and avoid shooting with if necessary.

[countb]

bugger!!!!!I thought we were entering my territory.
Some escorts have done porn,some want to try it for the first time.
Safe to say ive been lucky to see about 5 major names in porn as escorts.4 were excellent,one was bloody awful

[Dace]

and "realpunting" is a site sponsor always baffles me given the rule

[Naomixxx]

Hi KazB,

I have agreed to do a sex party on the basis that I won't be doing oral without and this has been agreed. Unless those I work with have up to date certs and Id I won't do owo and of course, no penetration without condoms and because I insist on this, I have been refused party work apart from at parties organised by Peter Shelman. In addition, I have lost a lot of shoots because I refuse to do owo if the other performer isn't tested. It seems that a lot of people feel that as long as penetration is protected if the performer doesn't have certs, then there is no, or minimal risk - not true, syphallis can be caught and this has long term, serious health implications and can seriously weaken the immune system. In addition to syphallis which really is a nasty sti, ghonnorea and chlamydia can also be caught from doing owo. Of course stis can be caught when people have up to date certs, but all we can do is keep the risks to a minimum.
My point is that it's possible to do sex parties/sex work without putting other performers at any undue risk, by using condoms for oral as well as penetration.

Naomi XXX
>

[KazB]

Hi Naomi - it's reassuring to hear that some girls at least protect their health and others by refusing oral without and cim. From what I have heard and seen however, I think that you are one of the exceptions rather than the norm.

I don't have any issue with escorts, or girls such as yourself who practise safe sex. My only issue is with performers who do oral without or bareback with untested parties and then turn up at shoots with their now invalid cert potentially spreading their recent gifts to all and sundry. If they are upfront about what they do and it's common knowledge, then I am more inclined to have a bit more respect for them as then it gives the other party a choice whether to work with them or not.

And I don't giving a flying **** who I offend by saying this....to anyone who is offended by this - well your invalid cert offends me.....your potentially contagious diseases offend me.

Naomi I hope your good example will help influence other performers hun x

[ukbritbabefan]

This is what i have never understood
Most performers wont work with someone unless their certs are up to date(and rightly so)
Yet i hear of(and in some cases seen) Female stars given OWO to "joes off the street" at parties.
Cant understand that one

[Peter]

ukbritbabefan wrote:

> This is what i have never understood
> Most performers wont work with someone unless their certs are
> up to date(and rightly so)
> Yet i hear of(and in some cases seen) Female stars given OWO to
> "joes off the street" at parties.
> Cant understand that one

Agreed. Significantly increases the risk to the people who only work certed.

Never the twain should meet in my opinion.