Massive tits doesn't always mean sexy

[Arginald Valleywater]

With the current obsession in perfectly formed girls getting stupidly big boob jobs why is the industry driving these models to having tits that look plain silly? Or is it a case of keeping up with the Jones's in the bosom stakes?

Personally nothing looks less erotic than tits at 180 degrees apart and a massive scar visible from 50 yards. Sexy it is not.

[Mr Mark]

Massive, firm, NATURAL breasts are another thing though....

Totally agree, when it comes to boob jobs though. Gemma Atkinson is the only girl i can think of with a decent boob job.... most look appalling :/ ... and there's nothing sexy about a girl who thinks that having her body mutilated is clever. A total turn off.

[planeterotica]

I prefer natural girls, big tits or little tits who cares just along as the girl is naughty!wink!

[one eyed jack]

Whaddya mean why is the industry driving these girls to having boob jobs Arginald? You mean the girls dont have minds of their own?

With the exception of one company (who shall remain nameless) I have never heard any producer endorse or pressure any girl into getting one.

Not ONE! EVER!

I'd prefer girls with itty bitty titties to remain that way...but its not all about me, the next man or the industry is it?

Girls make these decision to do so because they do it for themselves. I could write a whole essay for the reasons they do so which involve vanity, self esteem and...well because its the done thing to do because porn stars are supposed to look like porn stars etc.

Hmm maybe I could right a thesis on this subject for

[myson]

Continuum Studio wrote:
Sandie Caine's boob job was terrifically successful. Plump, beautiful shape, nice feel, no markings, couldn't tell they weren't natural.

I must agree with you there Continuum, Sandies' chesticles do look superb and extremely yummy.

However, I think I would prefer to check them out for myself (purely for scientific research of course) !wink! !grin!

Returning to the theme of this thread though, personally I prefer natural (big or small) but have no objections to boob jobs. As long as they're well done and look as natural as possible.

Myson

[jj]

...could have done with your insight in the Laura Michaels flame-war,
sorry, thread....
Is that 'no-pressure' thing the same in the US, though? I wonder...

Anyhoo, I talked it over with a friend who has a lot of experience of the
biz, and this is what he had concluded:
"What irritates me in these kinds of discussions, is that the performers
in question first claim to want to hear opinions, when in fact all they
want to hear is confirmation and positive reinforcement that they have
done the right thing. When some/most fans disapprove of the idea of
getting a boobjob, they get very defensive and all of sudden it's "her
body and I do it for myself and nobody else". This was especially the
case with [name removed by me]. It seems to me that they are really
unsure of themselves and they want to have our permission to go ahead
with it. They want to be reassured that it's the best thing for them to do".

I'm still stumped.

[chuck60]

My pennysworth:

As an enthusiastic tit lover for many years I`d go for quality over size.

E.g: "Nina" at UK Roadtrips, tiny breasts but incredibly horny.
Jesse St. James, beautiful 80`s pornstar, tiny tits.
Carol Brown, big, soft and natural.
Lara Latex, perfect shape, lovely pink nipples.
Etc. etc.

[Androm]

In the US the new way of doing boob jobs is through the bellybutton. Slide a bag under the skin up into it''s in position then fill. No scar and looks so much better.

I would not want to say to a girl 'never' to get a boob job but if there already cup size C or D not sure why they feel the need to be an "E" or something like that? Boobs like footballs are not that nice!