porn censorship R18s

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
middle_aged_dutchman
Posts: 305
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: porn censorship R18s

Post by middle_aged_dutchman »

I kept birds for more than twenty years. I often saw my green cardinal bird fuck my red-whiskered bulbul.
And perhaps horses don't fuck cows, but they do fuck donkeys, producing mules. And what about the liger (offspring of a lion and a tiger), the cama (offspring of a camel and a lama), the zorse (offspring of a zebra and a horse), the zenkey (offspring of a zebra and a donkey), the geep (offspring of a goat and a sheep)?

Just a few links to some interesting creatures:






This does not mean animal porn should be allowed. I think it should be illegal, just like child porn.

Scat films, on the other hand, should be allowed - but only on condition that I don't have to watch them.

joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: porn censorship R18s

Post by joe king »

Just saying 'it shouldn't be allowed' isn't good enough. Under the human rights act you would have to show a social pressing need, harm and be strictly justified.

'While it is not incumbent on a State to show that the restriction is indispensable, it is not enough for it to show that the restriction is reasonable. The European Court of Human Rights has imposed a strict test of necessity, relying on such concepts as pluralism, tolerance and broad-mindedness. The overriding principle is clear: since the right in question is to be regarded as fundamental, any restriction of it must be strictly justified'



~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
mk13
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: porn censorship R18s

Post by mk13 »

@joe King

You stated:

'While it is not incumbent on a State to show that the restriction is indispensable, it is not enough for it to show that the restriction is reasonable. The European Court of Human Rights has imposed a strict test of necessity, relying on such concepts as pluralism, tolerance and broad-mindedness. The overriding principle is clear: since the right in question is to be regarded as fundamental, any restriction of it must be strictly justified'

Could you tell me which article this pertains too.


Mark
mk13
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: porn censorship R18s

Post by mk13 »

@joe King

Sorry I have found the answer to my above question in your link.

Mark
Deuce Bigolo
Posts: 9910
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: O/T JK

Post by Deuce Bigolo »

Leonard Nimoys unknown Older Brother?

cheers
B....OZ
Post Reply