right or wrong

[sandie]

i have a dilemma.

someone has approached me with reguards to buying out takes of to quote...

...A guy cannot get an erection,
A guy or girl farts during sex,
A girl gags and/or vomits after oral sex,
A girl defecates after anal sex.
A girl gets shot in the eye with sperm,
and any other accidents that you can think of.

now is this morally right or wrong.

i am still yet to learn what use this footage has for said comapny.

[Arnold Layne]

his name isn't Rob Black is it Sandie?

[Peter]

Its all about risk and reward.

Is the financial reward from selling this stuff outweighing the risk you take of becoming known as the producer who sells footage of girls puking and farting, and losing possible models because of it?

[Ace]

'A guy or girl farts during sex'

Thats pretty normal in my house Sandie

[Arnold Layne]

If you have this kind of material Sandie, and the girls consented to it, I don't see the problem, not that I'd ever watch it, but I'm sure someone wants to otherwise he would'nt want to buy it

[kym]

dont sell em babe if that was supposed to happen in the shoot then ya cool but because they where clips of stuff that wasnt meant to happen

then i think it may be the wrong thing to do,

and those things can happen to any1 its the fact that you put your trust the producers not to show the rest of the world, the bits that go wrong

xxx

[MisterC]

Unless everything happened on a premeditated basis don't do it you are leaving yourself open to lots of potential from nasty old farts wearing horsehair syrups.

C

[jj]

Not an advert !!
Amazing.....if you'll excuse all the tags.

[vila]

I would say that if you're not absolutely certain what the material will be used for, don't supply it.

Farts can be funny in all sorts of situations and it's hard to see what other purpose they might be wanted for, but the other events could be used in a way that promotes the idea of obtaining pleasure from inflicting unpleasantness on women. We all know that a certain amount of this goes on anyway (e.g. the current fad for 'gagging' videos etc), but usually in a form that makes it obvious that the woman is a willing party and is, at least to some extent, acting. But if she isn't expecting it the results could be used to portray something a bit more sinister. It's a subtle difference, but valid, I think. By the same token, this kind of material could also be used in anti-porn propaganda.

On the other hand it could be intended for a porn version of 'You've Been Framed', but for that I would think you ought to get the models' permission before releasing the footage. Earning a crust by doing all sorts of lewd acts in front of a camera is one thing, having the more unpleasant side-effects paraded for the world to see is something different.

[videokim]

Hi Sandie

Hold onto them as it will affect the dignity of the performers, i agree with villa about them using it for a you've been framed type programme.
Funny ones like falling off a chair, being caught unaware by cumshots can be funny if edited right but hold on to them as i've done so you can release it as an extra for your customers.

Kim xxx