egafd.com

So without naming names, who has a problem with her? The producer of the Kylie stuff? The producer of the Skye stuff? The Producer of the charlenehart website? Or her ex boyfriend? As that would help clear up whether or not its fair game to be discussed on here. Boyfriend/Girlfriend tiffs i would ...

"I assume that the 'material' you are referring to is when she used the name skyeblu. Not very nice stuff at all." Yes, and I think thats probably what the whole hoo-ha concerns, I doubt the hardcore stuff would be an issue for her, with all the Big Brother stars vids, doing a porn film now is like ...

Well the thread is about both of them isn't it? As thats why her situation is as it is now, the thread reads like a model who tries to skip out of her contracts.When in fact it may be more like girl who wants to be model leaves boyfriend and his amateur videos behind and fucks him off big time?

Fine so why don't these threads get deleted? We are not talking about the work she did as Kylie we are talking about the work she did as Skye, a lot of which is basically illegal, so why do these threads remain? Any mention of Claire Brown earlier this year was immediatley removed, and there are a ...

I don't think the bad blood exists because of the material Charlene produced as if it was filmed when she was 18 and 19 it was before she moved into glamour work, I am also sceptical of the idea that the material was somehow released as some kind of punishment and that it had not already been put ...

Autolycus - you make all these good points as to why Charlene Hart's name and work should be in the public domain with regard to the extreme material she produced in the past, free for everyone to discuss and view. And that she should not deny what she did etc, nor expect special treatment, yet the ...

Thats all the content from the website I believe.

I think she should take the attitude of 'I don't give a fuck' whats behind her is now the past. I am aware of the work she did and the reality is the only way you will see it is if you want to, so it says as much about the viewer as it does about Charlene, moreso in fact. So she has nothing to be ...

This post is basically spam, as is your response on the Gypsies thread below encouraging people to visit your crappy links site. I had a post removed of a girl in a wedding dress, why yours has been left on, and this pointless crap god knows.

Heres a couple:-

[img]http://www.boreme.com/boreme/media-pict ... ding-3.jpg[/img]

This girls 16!

[img]http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/0 ... 90x800.jpg[/img]